Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 77(16): 1994-2003, 2021 04 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1188684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted many aspects of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care, including timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). OBJECTIVES: The goal of the NACMI (North American COVID-19 and STEMI) registry is to describe demographic characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with STEMI. METHODS: A prospective, ongoing observational registry was created under the guidance of 3 cardiology societies. STEMI patients with confirmed COVID+ (group 1) or suspected (person under investigation [PUI]) (group 2) COVID-19 infection were included. A group of age- and sex-matched STEMI patients (matched to COVID+ patients in a 2:1 ratio) treated in the pre-COVID era (2015 to 2019) serves as the control group for comparison of treatment strategies and outcomes (group 3). The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, stroke, recurrent myocardial infarction, or repeat unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: As of December 6, 2020, 1,185 patients were included in the NACMI registry (230 COVID+ patients, 495 PUIs, and 460 control patients). COVID+ patients were more likely to have minority ethnicity (Hispanic 23%, Black 24%) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (46%) (all p < 0.001 relative to PUIs). COVID+ patients were more likely to present with cardiogenic shock (18%) but were less likely to receive invasive angiography (78%) (all p < 0.001 relative to control patients). Among COVID+ patients who received angiography, 71% received PPCI and 20% received medical therapy (both p < 0.001 relative to control patients). The primary outcome occurred in 36% of COVID+ patients, 13% of PUIs, and 5% of control patients (p < 0.001 relative to control patients). CONCLUSIONS: COVID+ patients with STEMI represent a high-risk group of patients with unique demographic and clinical characteristics. PPCI is feasible and remains the predominant reperfusion strategy, supporting current recommendations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 98(2): 217-222, 2021 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-695689

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic migitation measures on of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care. BACKGROUND: We previously reported a 38% decline in cardiac catheterization activations during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic mitigation measures. This study extends our early observations using a larger sample of STEMI programs representative of different US regions with the inclusion of more contemporary data. METHODS: Data from 18 hospitals or healthcare systems in the US from January 2019 to April 2020 were collecting including number activations for STEMI, the number of activations leading to angiography and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), and average door to balloon (D2B) times. Two periods, January 2019-February 2020 and March-April 2020, were defined to represent periods before (BC) and after (AC) initiation of pandemic mitigation measures, respectively. A generalized estimating equations approach was used to estimate the change in response variables at AC from BC. RESULTS: Compared to BC, the AC period was characterized by a marked reduction in the number of activations for STEMI (29%, 95% CI:18-38, p < .001), number of activations leading to angiography (34%, 95% CI: 12-50, p = .005) and number of activations leading to PPCI (20%, 95% CI: 11-27, p < .001). A decline in STEMI activations drove the reductions in angiography and PPCI volumes. Relative to BC, the D2B times in the AC period increased on average by 20%, 95%CI (-0.2 to 44, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 Pandemic has adversely affected many aspects of STEMI care, including timely access to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for PPCI.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2 , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 13(7): 1615-1626, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-680213
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA